)
There’s a growing belief that AI will make low-code platforms redundant. With AI code assistants, agents and “vibe-coding” tools promising to build software from a simple prompt, it’s easy to assume platforms are no longer needed.
Gartner’s latest research tells a very different story.
AI is changing how software is built, but low-code platforms are becoming more important, not less. The future is not AI or low-code. It’s AI working inside low-code.
Here’s what that really means in practice.
AI tools are incredibly good at producing working software quickly. Ask for a feature, get logic, screens and flows in seconds.
But speed creates a new challenge.
As AI-generated code scales, teams start to see:
inconsistent patterns and duplicated logic
bloated codebases
unclear ownership and explainability
growing security and compliance risks
AI tends to generate more code, not less. And more code means more surface area to maintain, secure and evolve over time.
This is where low-code still plays a critical role.
One of Gartner’s most important distinctions is this:
Vibe coding accelerates typing.
Low-code accelerates engineering.
Low-code platforms are designed to:
reduce the total amount of code that exists
enforce architectural standards by default
promote reuse through visual models and components
abstract boilerplate and plumbing away from teams
limit technical debt over the life of a system
AI can help you build faster.
Low-code helps you build something that still works properly in two, five or ten years.
They solve different problems.
Used without guardrails, generative AI introduces risks that most teams underestimate:
Security: AI-generated logic can be opaque and hard to audit
Compliance: explainability matters, especially in regulated industries
Maintainability: debugging AI-generated code at scale is painful
Technical debt: fast starts often lead to messy futures
Low-code platforms already address many of these issues through built-in governance: access controls, audit logs, validation rules and controlled extensibility.
When AI operates inside that environment, the risk profile changes completely.
The most effective teams are not choosing between AI and low-code. They are deliberately combining them.
The pattern looks like this:
Use low-code platforms as the default foundation for enterprise-grade and customer-facing systems
Limit vibe coding to scoped, supervised use cases, such as prototyping or non-critical internal tools
Enable platform-native AI assistants so generation happens within a governed environment
Let AI handle repetitive setup, while people focus on architecture, integrations and edge cases
Modern low-code platforms like OutSystems and Microsoft Power Apps already follow this model, using AI to generate data models, screens and logic that teams then refine visually.
A practical delivery model is emerging:
Start with a natural-language prompt to generate an app scaffold
Refine it visually in the low-code environment
Hand over to experienced developers for performance, security and scaling
This widens who can contribute, speeds up delivery and keeps quality high. Business users get involved earlier, engineers focus on high-value work, and teams avoid the chaos of unmanaged AI output.
Beyond single prompts, AI agents are now being used to orchestrate multi-step workflows: generating components, wiring integrations, producing dashboards or automating repetitive build tasks.
When those agents connect into low-code platforms rather than bypassing them, teams get:
consistency
reuse
traceability
far lower long-term risk
Speed with structure always beats speed alone.
AI isn’t replacing low-code. It’s making it better.
Low-code platforms are evolving into the governed backbone for AI-assisted delivery, giving teams the freedom to move fast without losing control. Gartner’s view is clear: AI-assisted development will become standard. The teams that succeed will be the ones that pair AI with the right foundations.
At Doddle, this matches exactly what we see on real projects.
AI for acceleration.
Low-code for longevity.
If you’re figuring out how to combine the two without creating future headaches, that’s the problem space we love working in.